Legal Issues

I am filled with deep remorse as I write this letter. Nothing I can say or do will justify my actions. Suffice it for me to say that I was driven by sibling love and concern for my family. Impersonating my sister in the exam was a desperate attempt to save her mental anguish and depression. Since my father passed away two years ago, she has been the care provider for my ailing mother. Passing this exam was her ticket to better job prospects and a steady income. She spent over seven hours a day...

Law firms are not immune from computer security breaches and computer crimes.  Indeed, given the nature of the legal profession, there are several significant issues that need to be addressed when implementing and maintaining an information technology system that stores information about the law firm, its attorneys, and its clients.  There are law firm proprietary secrets, case strategies, and information that are ostensibly protected by the attorney-client privilege.  Law firms,...

A tort is a damage that is done intentionally or unintentionally to a person or property of another person. There are two categories of torts which include negligence torts and the intentional torts. Negligence torts will arise from cases like motor accidents and personal injury of various types while Intentional torts include things like illegal occupation of land. This paper is going to look at the various forms of torts and regulatory risks that a company can face and come up with various ways...

The functions of Riordan Manufacturing in the domain of global plastics require quite a number of considerable ethical and legal responsibilities. Such responsibilities greatly influence various business aspects revolving around employees, customer relations, focus and the future projections of the firm. Based on the general effects of the US economic crisis, Riordan Manufacturing Company has to ensure total compliance with the required standards, rules and regulations in order sail through the...

Question 1  Kasky v. Nike , Inc. The California Supreme Court, in the instant case, drew a distinction between noncommercial speech and commercial speech because such a distinction affected the type of constitutional interpretation that would be applied to the underlying facts.  The court noted, as an initial matter, that the First Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits actions or efforts to restrict speech.  This right, however, is not unlimited and the United States...