Legal Issues

Since many criminals and terrorists these days plan ahead very delicately for their criminal act in order to perform it with no or negligible flaws, and make sure that they dont leave behind any evidence that may put them into jail or death therefore, it has become difficult for the prosecutors to identify the real criminal. So, in order to minimize or hide their incapability or inefficiency, the prosecutors file the criminal charges against those people whom they think are guilty even if they dont get sufficient evidence against them. This act is totally unlawful and unethical. A person who might not have committed any crime is put forward to face the punishment, only because of his guilty attitude that he or she shouldnt have.

A prosecutor might have a quality of being skeptical over everyone when there is no evidence found against anyone who has committed the crime. So the margin of error lies with the prosecutor because of his or her natural quality of being skeptical. Secondly, this sort of prosecution is also done when the prosecutor is somehow and to some extent involved with the criminal. It means that the prosecutor might not file the charges against the actual criminal, and hence would go after another person who is not a criminal, but he himself thinks that he is a criminal. It is the duty of prosecutors to uphold the law and the perform a fair trial secondly, they should integrate the criminal justice system third, they should take measures to increase and polish their skills, knowledge, abilities, and qualities that are necessary for the correct and appropriate performance of their jobs and finally, they must also abide by the human rights and norms.